Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thijmen Loof vs Johan Nikles Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Loof vs Nikles analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Thijmen Loof vs Johan Nikles Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Loof 0 - 0 Nikles
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Loof has won 44.85% of points on their second serve, while Nikles has won 46.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Loof, in recent form, has won 47.44% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nikles has won 55.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.75% and 38.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Loof has saved 66.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nikles has saved 58.3% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Loof has won 44.68% of matches played (W/L 21/ 26), with Nikles winning 63.64% (W/L 28/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Loof has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 25/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Nikles has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 70/ 46), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 3/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Loof has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.68% of matches (W/L 21/ 26), where as Nikles has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.42% of matches (W/L 26/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Loof has played against opponents with an average rank of 35.79 while Nikles has played against players with an average rank of 127.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Loof has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nikles has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Loof has converted 43.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nikles has converted 47.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
868
Rank
256
High
27
Age
R
Plays
Form
46% (59-68)
Career Total W/L
58% (270-196)
50% (15-15)
YTD W/L
64% (28-16)
$0
Career Prize Money
$11,650
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Thijmen Loof vs Johan Nikles For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Loof VS Nikles
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Thijmen Loof | Johan Nikles |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (15/15) | 64% (28/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 51% (34/33) | 63% (62/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (325/312) | 56% (504/400) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 78% (7/2) | 60% (3/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (8/8) | 66% (25/13) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 89 | 17 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 66 | 75 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:16 | 1:19:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 30.43 | 127.57 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (1006/1559) | 68% (1569/2308) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (687/1006) | 62% (967/1569) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (248/553) | 46% (341/739) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (52/120) | 47% (122/258) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (538/1460) | 45% (1026/2294) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (15/15) | 68% (26/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (15/28) | 63% (27/43) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 63% (5/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 42% (5/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 81% (32/26) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 19% (32/6) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (14/2) | 17% (12/2) |
Thijmen Loof Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Thijmen Loof
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
8
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thijmen Loof
Player
Adrien Berrut
74%
(
60 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
87
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Massimo Giunta
Player
Thijmen Loof
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
95)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Fajta
Player
Thijmen Loof
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thijmen Loof
Player
Gabor Hornung
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fryderyk Lechno-Wasiutynski
Player
Thijmen Loof
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 3-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Joaquim Almeida
Player
Thijmen Loof
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
4-6 6-0 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Harrison Adams
Player
Thijmen Loof
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
72%
(
21 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
16 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thijmen Loof
Player
Juan Sebastian Osorio
56%
(
48 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
96
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Johan Nikles Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Johan Nikles
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
5
Aces
1
10
Double Faults
0
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
27%
(
7 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Maximilian Homberg
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
46%
(
31 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Sandro Kopp
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
64 of
95)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
90
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Johan Nikles
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Thomas Gerbaud
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
52 of
78)
6
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Nicolas Colne
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Axel Garcian
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Johan Nikles
61%
(
77 of
127)
1st Serve %
71%
(
90 of
127)
4
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
53 of
90)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
53 of
127)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
55 of
127)
129
Total Points Won
125
|
6-7(3) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damien Wenger
Player
Johan Nikles
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Mario Martinez Serrano
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Loof Vs Nikles Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Loof are available here and Nikles photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
